February 22, 2012
By Rebecca Gross
Mackey Apartments (R.M. Schindler, 1939). Home of the MAK Center’s Artists and Architects-in-Residence Program. Photograph by Joshua White
When Vienna-born architect Rudolph Schindler moved to L.A. in 1920, he brought with him a modernist aesthetic that would produce some of the city’s most distinctive buildings. In 1994, his own home was rehabilitated into the MAK Center for Art and Architecture, which was recently awarded an FY 2012 Art Works grant from the NEA. A satellite of the MAK Museum of Applied Arts in Vienna, the Los Angeles center was designed in part to celebrate Schindler by fostering the progressive thinking that he championed. Exhibitions, lectures, film screenings, and architectural tours are held regularly, and visitors may also simply explore the Schindler House and the nearby Fitzpatrick-Leland House and Mackey Apartments, both of which were also designed by Schindler. The MAK Center also offers six-month residencies twice a year for two artists and two architects, who live in the Mackey Apartments during their time in Los Angeles. I spoke with MAK Center Director Kimberli Meyer about the residency program, her favorite buildings in L.A., and the dual ugliness and beauty of the City of Angels.
NEA: How do you think L.A. is uniquely suited to host an organization dedicated to progressive architecture, such as the MAK Center?
KIMBERLI MEYER: The cultural climate here is extremely open-minded; it always has been. It has this history of being a place where you can come and take risks, and if you fail, no one really holds it against you. The clients of architecture are more willing to take risks with architects. For architects themselves, there are a lot less constraints in many ways. If I’m comparing it to New York or the East Coast, there’s more land here, and the climate is extremely mild. City planning has been kind of haphazard, for better or for worse, so there’s a lot more freedom here to do things.
In some ways, if you look back at L.A. history, the avant-garde in architecture came well before the avant-garde in art. I think that art has certainly caught up with architecture in that regard, but there remains a really strong atmosphere of experimentation here.
NEA: How do you think architecture can influence or define the character of a city?
MEYER: Architecture and planning and development all work very closely together to form the identity of a city. If design is a strong component to the built environment, it affects a certain consciousness on people; people understand why design is important. They learn to recognize what it’s doing in the landscape.
L.A. is both beautiful and ugly at the same time. The ugliness comes from a kind of completely haphazard and slapdash approach to planning and building. It’s a young city, so things are often not built to last, they’re built for the short-term. On the other hand, that’s also the exact same situation which allows people to try things. Modern architecture here really flourished. We have an enormous treasure trove of modern houses, for example. Los Angeles is odd that way, because so much of its great architecture is actually domestic and so it’s privatized. But I think that’s starting to change, and we’re getting some really good public buildings, like Disney Hall, and the Caltrans Building by Morphosis [led by Thom Mayne]. What it’s starting to do is give the city a certain kind of identity in terms of a commitment to civic aesthetics.















